RC (Reinforced Concrete) vs. Wood

Merit of RC

Keeps high asset value. Banks like it.
Takes longer loan period thanks to long legal life span.
Durable. Strong to disaster.
Popular among tenants. 
Tend to be a big bldg, big asset.
Easier to manage than wood.

Demerit of RC

Expensive to manage
Expensive property tax
Expensive repair costs

Merit of Wood

Higher yield
Cheaper bldg
Huge depreciation costs
Easy to repair
Cheap repair costs

Demerit of Wood

Hard to get a bank loan
Ages fast. Needs regular maintenance.

 
RC buildings tend to be a big scale in terms of its size and price. Having one RC bldg could equal to having multiple wood bldgs in terms of how much cash flow it makes. Plus there is a huge possibility to get a long loan period which makes it easier to create your financial assets bigger in such a short span.
However its downside is since repair costs are expensive, if there are some damages or flaws, it’s going to be a big payment.

Wood buildings tend to yield higher returns than RC bldgs in the RE market.
Besides its running costs are not so expensive so cash flow tends to high.
Its downsides would be it is hard to get a bank loan and requires regular maintenance again aging. 

 

Summary

Both types of building structures have pros and cons. 
There isn’t “the best” structure.
Having a mix of RC and Wood in your portfolio would be a nice way to save on tax and increase your assets.


RC (Reinforced Concrete) vs. Wood
  • このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
  • カカオトーク